In the News


Biden expands Defense Production Act scope to additional minerals

View More

Rail Security Alliance Morning Briefing

View More

An Appeal to Keep Tariffs on Rail Products

When global rail manufacturer CRRC (China Railway Rolling Stock Corp.) entered the U.S. passenger rail market nearly ten years ago, winning a $560 million contract to manufacture new railcars for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), its bid amounted to only about half as much as its market competitors. It was the Chinese SOE’s (state-owned enterprise) first entry into the U.S. transit market, adding to its already monopolistic self-declared 83% share of rail rolling stock manufacturing worldwide.

In the years since MBTA turned its passenger train manufacturing over to China, CRRC has been awarded more than $2.6 billion in U.S. taxpayer-supported contracts to make passenger railcars for Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia and Los Angeles. Federal funding played a part in three of the four contracts. In the process, according to an Oxford Economics report (download below), the U.S. has lost thousands of domestic freight rail manufacturing and supply jobs to China.

As the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) conducts its required review of Trade Act of 1974 Section 301 tariffs, it’s worth remembering that CRRC is just the kind of foreign entity that Section 301 of the Trade Act is intended to guard against.

In a letter to USTR Ambassador Katherine Tai, the Rail Security Alliance—representing domestic rail manufacturers and suppliers and the industry’s 65,000 family-wage jobs—urged the Biden Administration to maintain Section 301 tariffs “on all railcar parts, as this represents U.S. policy that has spanned Republican and Democratic Administrations and has wide bipartisan support on Capitol Hill.”

In calling on USTR and the Biden Administration to maintain these tariffs, RSA joins other American manufacturers and suppliers who urgently called on the need to safeguard the U.S. from China’s unfair trade practices.

Meanwhile, recent news coverage reports that CRRC may be blaming its litany of quality problems, train derailments, years-long production delays and management failures on Section 301 tariffs. As Commonwealth Magazine recently reported, an MBTA executive said the agency may be now looking “to ease up on tariffs and sanctions against China.” For the record, that is exactly the wrong thing to do.

While CRRC has made alarming inroads in the U.S. transit arena, quality issues aside, the threat to America’s freight railcar manufacturing industry is equally imminent.

Addressing Ambassador Tai, RSA commented on the critical role of freight rail in America’s critical infrastructure: “It safely and efficiently carries hazardous materials, military equipment, key commodities, energy products and everyday goods. In 2013, President Obama and Vice President Biden recognized freight rail’s importance to the security of critical infrastructure by issuing Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD-21), explicitly including the freight rail industry. It is vital to every state in the U.S.”

One only must look at Australia to see CRRC’s designs for the American freight rail market. In less than a decade, CRRC employed anti-competitive tactics to entirely wipe out Australia’s once-thriving domestic railcar manufacturing industry. Today, Australia’s railcar manufacturing is completely controlled by CRRC.

Then there’s the issue of China’s anticompetitive practices toward foreign firms in China: “For instance, foreign market access to China’s rail markets has decreased dramatically in recent decades. The Association of the European Rail Supply Industry (UNIFE) found that the Chinese rail market was only 17% accessible for the period of 2017–2019, as compared with 63% for the period of 2009–2011. China also has a long, continuing pattern of forced technology transfer in the rail sector.”

Given China’s playbook—as well as the fact that CRRC receives significant subsidies from the Chinese government, including $271 million in explicit government subsidies in 2020 and larger implicit subsidies—maintaining Section 301 tariffs on all rail components is not optional.

“The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated that direct subsidies to Chinese firms represent less than 20% of total industrial spending. For instance, as one of the ten sectors China targets under the Made in China 2025 strategy, CRRC is also eligible to receive preferential subsidies and tax incentives for R&D. In addition, China reduced the income tax rate for high-tech firms like CRRC from 25% to 15% and raised the rate of additional deductions of R&D expenses from 50% to 75%.”

Equally troubling is the fact that CRRC has twice been included on the U.S. Defense Department entity list, and that company executives and employees have direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army.

All of these factors enable CRRC to significantly underbid private companies for global rolling stock contracts, posing a direct threat to our domestic rail manufacturing industry and national security. All these factors warrant maintaining Section 301 tariffs on all rail components.

Voicing the interest of 65,000 American workers, RSA called on USTR and the Biden Administration to uphold America’s interests:

“Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 is a key enforcement mechanism that can be used to address a wide variety of discriminatory acts, policies and practices of U.S. trading partners. Current Section 301 tariffs are vital to push back aggressively and appropriately on China.”

And there’s no entity more in need of push-back than CRRC.



View More

Our Energy Future – Economic Club of Minnesota

Emma Bishop, Assistant Vice President with Venn Strategies takes part in a panel discussion on energy.

View More

PD catheter paper in CKJ December issue

December issue of CKJ, Clinical Kidney Journal, Volume 15, Issue 12, December 2022, Pages 2177–2185.

View More on Clinical Kidney Journal

DOE awards $2.8B to boost EV mineral production

The Biden administration on Wednesday announced $2.8 billion in grant awards to support domestic electric vehicle battery production and a new initiative to secure a “reliable and sustainable supply” of EV minerals.

“Together, these actions will improve America’s energy independence, strengthen national security, support good-paying jobs across battery supply chains, and lower costs for working families,” according to a fact sheet on the program.

Grants for battery production: DOE announced that $2.8 billion in grant funding from the infrastructure law has been awarded to 20 manufacturing and processing companies, leveraging more than $9 billion including private sector investments to boost domestic production of EV batteries. The money is intended to help develop enough battery-grade lithium to supply about 2 million EVs a year, plus enough battery-grade graphite for 1.2 million EVs and enough battery-grade nickel for 400,000 EVs a year, according to the administration.

The funding will also support the installation of the first large-scale, commercial lithium electrolyte salt production facility and the first lithium iron phosphate cathode facility in the United States.

“What this is is the start of a battery supply chain industry,” said Ben Steinberg, executive vice president of lobbying firm Venn Strategies, six of whose clients won awards as part of Wednesday’s announcement. He said automakers and large cell makers had already committed to developing electric cars, but “what we don’t have here is the supply chain, the chemical processing, the mining, the recycling.”

The grants represent about half of a $6 billion pot of money in the infrastructure law for battery material manufacturing and recycling.

The American Battery Material Initiative: The Biden administration also launched a “whole-of-government effort to secure a reliable and sustainable supply of the critical minerals that power everything from electric vehicles to homes to defense systems.” The initiative will be led by a White House steering committee and coordinated by DOE with support from the Department of the Interior.

Wednesday’s announcement builds on a February 2021 executive order that launched a supply chain review that recommended a “mineral-by-mineral approach” to expanding sustainable domestic production and working with allies to diversify international supply chains.

Context: Three recently enacted pieces of legislation — the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the CHIPS & Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act — will invest more than $135 billion combined in electric vehicle capacity, including mineral sourcing and processing and battery manufacturing.

According to the White House, these actions have already resulted in “a domestic battery manufacturing boom, with companies announcing over $100 billion in EVs, battery and EV charging investments right here in the United States.”

The Biden administration also invoked the Defense Production Act to secure U.S. production of lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and manganese for EV production.

Biden has set a goal for electric vehicles to make up half of all new vehicles sold in the United States by 2030.

View More